Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years

Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Years (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Project This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Move "Epoch (reference date)" to "Epoch (date reference)"?[edit]

Please see Talk:Epoch (date reference)#RFC:Undiscussed page move. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jc3s5h (talkcontribs) 02:47, February 18, 2019 (UTC)

Template:Births and deaths TOC[edit]

The use of {{Births and deaths TOC}} and possibly adding a variant to Events sections is currently discussed at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Any sidebar template for Annual 12 months. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@PrimeHunter: - that discussion got archived here and I don't know if it can be "un-archived"? Elsewhere, I used Bump and Being worked on to prevent bot from moving to archive. JoeNMLC (talk) 17:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JoeNMLC: The Teahouse is a place to get help, not hold long discussions. You can continue the discussion here. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Year leads 2[edit]

Year lead edits are back on 100.2.177.233. Certes (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

...and 2600:4040:9B0D:EA00::0/64 (thanks to Brunton for reverting some). Certes (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They seem to be continuing. Brunton (talk) 07:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Certes. Still ongoing. I noticed that last time it seems to have been dealt with by Graham87. Is it worth notifying them, or does that sort of thing need to be done via an appropriate noticeboard? Brunton (talk) 09:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'll ping Graham87, who may be able either to deal with it or to advise us where to go. I don't think we're ready for AIV yet, as we haven't gone through the motions of repeating the four warnings for every new IP. Certes (talk) 12:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Certes and Brunton: Thanks for the note; all blocked and reverted. Notifying me is probably the best course of action in these cases. Graham87 13:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Use of photomontages and other pictorial designs[edit]

I previously asked User:4me689 to discuss this matter here, but I see that s/he has gone ahead and added their own designs to a number of year pages. This needs further thought. Deb (talk) 14:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of governance and policy studies 2020–present for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of governance and policy studies 2020–present is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of governance and policy studies 2020–present until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Prototyperspective (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

collage discussions[edit]

this message is here to tell everyone that there has been a discussion on collages at User talk:4me689/collage discussions 4me689 (talk) 11:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]