User talk:Mathglot

Jump to navigation Jump to search

My editing tips.

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:France on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the color blue in the tricolore. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mathglot (talk) 09:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar to add to your collection ;-)[edit]

Compass barnstar.png The Guidance Barnstar
For the tremendous assistance, advice, and guidance you generously offer to editors new, old, and indeterminate. Thank you!
Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 19:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated! Mathglot (talk) 01:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Table cell templates on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mathglot (talk) 22:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
For User talk:MWD115/Articles needing attribution. JBchrch talk 23:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated. Mathglot (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I remain in awe of your patience, kindness and pedagogy. Cheers. JBchrch talk 03:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Peng Shuai on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc undone. Mathglot (talk) 02:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid onset gender dysphoria controversy[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Rapid onset gender dysphoria controversy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Newimpartial (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rubbish. Neither you, nor any editor should issue false warnings on my Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You know that you don't need to get to the third revert before you recognize that you are, in fact, edit earring. You are an experienced editor. Newimpartial (talk) 20:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of course I do. My detailed edit summaries on the page with policy links made it clear for the reason for the reverts, and the second one says this:
"Statements by Wikipedia editors (i.e., Rfc's) do not override Wikipedia's neutrality policy; and the assertion regarding this website does not match sources and is prohibited by WP:NPOV. Show that this is WP:DUE or leave it alone."
As you are an experienced editor, you know that WP:NPOV is pillar two, and cannot be overridden except in the most extreme situations (which I wouldn't attempt), and in particular, not by an Rfc. The subsequent undo restored the POV version, and this is prohibited by WP:NPOV as the assertion about the 4th Wave Now website is very simply not supported in the article, regardless of all the bloviating going on at the Talk page to support the POV statement in the Lead, rather than simply supporting the claim with sources. It cannot remain this way. Mathglot (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When editors hold that NPOV and WP:V require X, and an RfC close endorses that view, but you personally believe that NPOV and WP:V require Y, not X, you do not have grounds for edit warring. You are too experienced an editor truly to believe that you are the only one that understands NPOV, so I am at a loss to grasp why you are trying to justify your repeated reverts. "Being right" is not one of the 3RRNO exemptions. Newimpartial (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, attempting to syllogism your way out of this, is simply one more method to add to the list of things that I see editors doing at the article Talk page, trying to make excuses for why they are unwilling to back up the assertion in the article. This has nothing to do with "being right", it's about WP:NPOV, WP:V. and WP:DUE. You are just one more editor bloviating about this, instead of slamming the door shut on this discussion, and all the endless, pointless, discussion about this at the Talk page by simply providing sources that support the claim. But I guess that's either too hard, or people are having too much fun arguing and would rather do that, instead of, you know, supporting policy by providing ironclad references that support their point of view.
But hey, arguing is a great derail, and takes the spotlight off the fact that the assertion in the lead is POV and unsupported. I know, let's try adding an edit-warring template to the UTP of an editor trying to move the spotlight to where it belongs; that oughta keep them busy for a little while, and off the article Talk page, where—omg!—editors might actually see that this is not, in fact, supported by the sources. Mathglot (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Many editors have already considered the sources in relation to NPOV and WP:V. That is what the (properly worded, properly closed) RfC was, in fact, about. I suggest that you WP:DROPTHESTICK before you fall off your high horse, and AGF rather than referring to other editors as bloviating when they understand the sources correctly differently from the way you understand them. Interpreting other editors (last I looked, all participating editors) as (something like) stonewalling when they express (apparently) sincere convictions about a previous RfC discussion is a rather significant AGF fail, IMO. Newimpartial (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I never said anything about non-AGF; and it is bloviating because sources would've been provided if there were any. Maybe this should be kicked up to a bigger venue where we can discuss the subservience of WP:LOCALCONSENSUS to policy, but honestly, this is way more time than I wanted to spend on this already. Maybe if I get the time, some time. Until then, best of luck. Mathglot (talk) 22:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't see that your statement that it is bloviating because sources would've been provided if there were any is already an AGF fail, compared to say accepting that other editors mean what they actually say - well, maybe that would bear further reflection on your part. Newimpartial (talk) 23:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Collapse shit-stirring by late-appearing troll

&? And I thought I was the only one getting the run-around from editors; like removing a good "For further reading" reference from "Axonometric Projection" (not by either of these two); instead of correcting some slight format or spelling error. The image of two snakes swallowing each other comes to mind. At least it keeps them from reverting others' inadvertent violations of the Sacred Order of the Beast ({Wp;S.O.B.)]. And gentlemen, "Bloviating", really! You are 'bloviating' whenever you use this word; even if it's like this: "You are bloviating." or even, "No, _you_ are bloviating, you pedantic bloviator." PS as pointless as this entry, I'm sure it has not fallen beneath the level of what precedes. Now, I have to go confabulate with the "Keeper of Tao". (talk) Ljc 22:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC) &??[reply]

Dear Mathglot, I got your last(?) message on my talk page, but decided to reply here; as the turmoil above is more enlivening :-)

@Mathglot: @Mathglot One of those should work with 4 "~'s". (talk) Ljc 19:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC) Mathglot[reply]

Unlike Newimpartial, whose comments have reason and policy/guidelines in mind behind them, regardless whether I happen to agree or not, there's no need to host pointless provocation by a johnny-come-lately third party with no skin in the game. Mathglot (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

@Mathglot: I wanted to alert you that you seem to have added an extra tilde in your 20:47, 28 January 2022 comment on Rapid onset gender dysphoria controversy, creating a timestamp but no signature. (Feel free to delete this section) Srey Srostalk 21:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Fixed. Mathglot (talk) 08:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar of Integrity[edit]

Barnstar of Integrity Hires.png The Barnstar of Integrity
About 2½ years ago, I began encountering you on the opposite side of some seemingly intractable editing disputes in controversial articles. In time I noticed that you invariably approached those disputes with genuine civility. I noticed that if you revised one of my edits, you weren't merely being tendentious or stuck in an entrenched position, but instead you actually improved on my version. (That's a rare admission for me to make.) Regardless of how deeply felt your starting position was in any dispute, you proved yourself uncommonly willing to examine contrary evidence with an open mind, and to be persuaded by a valid policy-based argument. The resulting consensus endured for a long time... but I suppose nothing lasts forever. In the ensuing years, I've become less active here, and I see that you've apparently become more active in a great many areas. I'm glad. Wikipedia has undoubtedly been improved as a result of your patient efforts and your integrity. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 20:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Very much appreciated. I remember the occasions you are referring to, and I learned a lot from those interactions, in no small part due toyour cogent comments and responses. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 02:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Brahma Chellaney on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment, and at Talk:Uyghur genocide on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done (declined to vote; failed RFCBEFORE). Mathglot (talk) 00:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bengal tiger on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Mathglot (talk) 01:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Mathglot (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is WP:VPP#Method of surname clarification; voted "not sure yet", so may need a revisit. Mathglot (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

&? Dear Mathglot, I replied to your note of 10 days ago, and tried to send notice to you. Even that failed. If you have the time, please see the bottom of my talk page. Best wishes, Lem (talk) Ljc 22:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sukses...[edit]

... gewenst, maar ik heb mijn twijfels hierbij... - DVdm (talk) 22:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DVdm:, lol; inderdaad... mvg, Mathglot (talk) 22:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of political parties in Italy on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Mathglot (talk) 09:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Daily Mail on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Initial response given; may need another. Mathglot (talk) 23:54, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Confederate States of America on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commented prior to bot request. Mathglot (talk) 07:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of political parties in Italy on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chindepalle[edit]

Hello, Mathglot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chindepalle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This draft was a test example, meant to be deleted. I should've G7'ed long ago. Mathglot (talk) 06:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lorem ipsum/joinreq[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Lorem ipsum/joinreq has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commented; obviated. Mathglot (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar Hires.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
An absolutely exceptional report at the Village Pump. This is one of the finest anti-abuse reports I've seen on Wikipedia! Curbon7 (talk) 02:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks; it relies a great deal on the efforts made by the great team at French Wikipedia, so they should get the credit. Mathglot (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bengali Kayastha on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ExpandTemplates link[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:ExpandTemplates link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

moved. Mathglot (talk) 03:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:US Census population on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Find medical sources mainspace[edit]

Template:Find medical sources mainspace, is this still a work in progress? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Martin Heidegger on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc undone, OP blocked. Mathglot (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Find medical sources mainspace[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Find medical sources mainspace has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commented. Mathglot (talk) 08:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I replied to you at the nomination, but the ping didn't send. Just notifying you here. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Extra-parliamentary on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar suggestion[edit]

In case you didn't see what I posted on my project's talk page yet, but here it is and please give it to those non-members and all who were and still are members of the project. It isn't just me who's helped clear those unused templates backlog. Thanks again. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Adolf Eichmann on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you still remember me[edit]

Hi Mathglot,

Do you remember our talk? Now I wonder if I should make any edits here because of reverts like this, or this. Were those reverts justified? The only reason I still make sporadic edits is developing my English. Is it to poor to edit here? But maybe I should find a better way to do so, like making comments on some forums, Youtube, etc, and limit my edits only to Simple Wiki? I am very curious about your opinion. Regards :-) 85.193.252.19 (talk) 17:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at your Talk page. Mathglot (talk) 19:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sayyid dynasty on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recommended withdrawal and other DR. Mathglot (talk) 19:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Iveco on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:IPod Touch on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gerasimov[edit]

Reported killed in Ukraine Elinruby (talk) 18:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Elinruby:, That's a different Gerasimov, not Valery Gerasimov (author of the doctrine); just some general who has the same last name. I was confused at first, too. Mathglot (talk) 19:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah this stuff is confusing. Apparently the second Russian general killed as well? In any event, if not the author of the doctrine, offtopic for both our topics. Thanks Elinruby (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Find medical sources mainspace/sandbox2[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Find medical sources mainspace/sandbox2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. Mathglot (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Social Darwinism on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as soon as it opened. Mathglot (talk) 19:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of France in WW2[edit]

The Germans did not primarily go through Belgium to take France in WW2. They invaded Belgium with only a small portion of their forces to cut off the flanks and to serve as a decoy, while the vast majority of the German breakthrough was at the French part of The Meuse. CessnaMan1989 (talk) 14:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CessnaMan1989: nobody will see your comments here; if you have a point to discuss regarding this topic (or any topic) and wish to gain supporters for your point of view, it would be best to discuss it at the article's Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 16:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi (Talk:Sayyid dynasty)[edit]

I got one simple question;

How can one mention of khizr khan by just one single author (Eaton) makes it mainstream, while Afghan which is mentioned by historical primary sources such as- muntakhabul lubab and many secondary sources by respected authors makes it fringe? I cant take hold of that logic. Thank you.84.211.45.132 (talk) 20:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol redirect vote2.svg Courtesy link: Talk:Sayyid dynasty#"RfC on Afghan inclusion"
Same response as I gave to the section right above this one. This is the wrong page for your comment, as no one will see your content-related question here; please ask again at the article Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox World War I[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Infobox World War I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aza24 (talk) 20:43, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On Talk:Ghost of Kyiv[edit]

Friendly notice: I pulled your recent "40,000-foot" comment into its own section ([1]) for visibility. It sounded like a different topic to me. If you disagree with re-sectioning please feel free to revert. --N8wilson 23:55, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@N8wilson:, in this case, it's fine. Even when placing it, I couldn't decide myself if it deserved its own section, and had already typed in a couple of longish sentences inviting separation into a different subsection, or section, and why, but then decided it was more distracting from the point I was trying to make than helpful, and dropped the extra text. In theory, your refactor into a new section is a WP:TPO violation, and imho one should tread lightly, there; asking me here was certainly the right thing to do. If I do so much as fix someone else's indent, comma, or missing curly bracket, I always call out "technical WP:TPO violation" in the edit summary. For anything more serious than that, I usually ask first, and back off if they are opposed. Nevertheless, in this case I have no quarrel with your doing what I was already prepared to invite you (or anyone) to do, so all's well that ends well!
Oh there might be a broken link now, since I think I linked to your section title from an older section higher up the page; I'll try to find it and fix it if you haven't already, as someone following that link might not find my comment. Thanks again, cheers, Mathglot (talk) 00:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Saw the link and (pretty sure I) fixed it during sectioning. Thanks for providing the context here as well. I take your point about starting on the User_talk page and appreciate you highlighting that here. Cheers back. --N8wilson 00:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Translation from French to English[edit]

I am seeking your help as a new contributor. I have been working on translating articles from French to English as a beginner contributor fluent in both languages and I am looking to have it reviewed by an experienced contributor for publishing? Would you be able to assist me? Thank you so much for your help, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Y2re6z7 (talkcontribs) 15:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Y2re6z7:, sure, but let's continue on your Talk page, so you'll find it more readily. Mathglot (talk) 17:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle has an RFC[edit]

Wikipedia talk:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:4CAE:9DE2:30BC:86D9 (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commented. Mathglot (talk) 07:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Celedón[edit]

Also might be to your taste. Currently tagged as a rough translation from an unknown language. I am not quite sure myself. There is a Catalan version, but the Spanish and Basque versions are both longer. There was a mistranslation of "bajada", which made me think Spanish, but towards the end of the article there is "neska", which turns out to be Basque for "young girl", possibly used as a foreign language word in either a Catalan or Spanish language text.

I am unsure about "blouses" and would like to run some speculation past you that is based on cognates (yes, I know, and that is why I am asking). In French "blouse" does not mean a woman's blouse, but rather a smock such as peasants once wore. So perhaps it is an idiom for peasants, or more precisely the French "paysan", which is not quite the same thing. More like "countryman". Celedón is in fact a country man, so....

If content is needed, I am thinking this is all about something rather like the burning of Zozobra except that he gets set on fire and is also known as Old Man Gloom, whereas Celedón seems pretty happy-go-lucky. Elinruby (talk) 05:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS - I am catching some low-hanging fruit on a first-do-no-harm basis Elinruby (talk) 05:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basque version is closest to English. Maybe it was Basque with Spanish words (bajada). Anyway, none of this is even slightly urgent, but if it tickles your curiosity into figuring out what a blouse group is, I would be interested in hearing the answer Elinruby (talk) 06:04, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Elinruby: The bajada actually is descent and is properly translated. Or at least, the concept is right, even if you might use a synonym in English. Think of Mary Poppins floating down to earth, would that be a "descent"? Because that's exactly what Celedon does: he floats down out of the sky with an umbrella. So, "descent of Celedon" seems fine. As for "blusas" that isn't necessarily "blouse" in English, but you can see what he's wearing in the images, and it's more like an unconstructed jacket like the kind that stockbrokers on Wall Street wear, or maybe doctors in hospital, or artists. One word you could use is "smock", which is a bit rarer in English than blusa in Spanish or blouse in French, but that pretty much nails the item. Oh, I just reread your comment, and you proposed "smock" already, ha! Well, that's exactly the right word, imho. So, that, plus whatever word describes what Mary Poppins does on her landing approach.
Here's an article with a video. Mathglot (talk) 07:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already fixed bajada; a steep grade on the highway south of Santa Fe is called La Bajada, so it's in my Spanish working vocabulary. Forget what it was before. Thank you for validating blouse, since we both know the perils of cognates. So a blouse group would be a group of country people? Not sure why it didn't occur to me to zoom the picture ;) Elinruby (talk) 07:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Elinruby: I would assume that a "blouse group" would be an example of metonymy, so yes, your assumption sounds right to me. Like we might say, "A bunch of suits were heading up to the revolving restaurant." Mathglot (talk) 07:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

K thanks ;) Elinruby (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Life is short, Wikipedia is large[edit]

The ratio of my effort to article improvement is too high at Russian information war against Ukraine. I am taking it off my watchlist to spend time more productively elsewhere.

After I fixed a couple of typos, the article got on my watchlist. When Buidhe moved the page, it generated something like four new lines on my watchlist, so I commented on her action, endorsing it. (Buidhe and I had previously edited together in mid-2021 on an article she posted to DYK and I reviewed, so once I recognized her name, I said hello.) I don't think it's possible for two editors to move a page "in tandem" whatever that means. Day after day of PAs and failure to AGF ensued. Elinruby listens to you, and it would be great if you stuck up a bit for WP:CIVIL.

Thanks for your helpful suggestions at Russian disinformation since 2000. HouseOfChange (talk) 00:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseOfChange: Thanks for your comment; I understand what you are saying. I am, in my own way, trying to do what you suggest, and trying to play peacemaker, although what with not having as much time as I'd like to devote to this, my efforts are probably too slow and maybe not as effective as you would wish. That said, there's a lot to be learned from the recent exchanges which I know have pained you. I don't question the good faith of everyone involved in this, and I think some things came up which would have been better off avoided; and I hope after the dust settles on this situation, and I can backfill a few other topics I've neglected lately, and that after that I can return to a situation here where everything is calmer, and we can all sit around the campfire, and figure out how to avoid a repeat.
In the meantime, I hope we meet again on whatever topic of history, current events, or anything else, I've enjoyed interacting with you. Drop by and say 'Hello' some time, if we don't bump into each other by accident. Until then, Happy editing!
P.S., Your section header sounds like a great title for an essay. Something to think about... Mathglot (talk) 01:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A different but Ukraine-related topic: Wikiquote. Very long quotes from fringe and Russian proxy websites (with a notable absence of any pro-Ukraine quotes) have been cobbled together to create what look like Wikipedia articles "showing" how the expansion of NATO and Ukraine being "really" a part of Russia force Putin's hand, while the danger of atomic war means that nobody should oppose him. Anyway, Wikiquote is supposed to be "sourced quotes from notable people." Quotes don't have to be NPOV, they can express an opinion, but piling up opinions from marginally notable (or not notable) fringers while until I got there the "2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis" article (version of 31 March) did not even include even one of these quotes: "Take these seeds and put them in your pockets," "Russian warship, go fuck yourself," and "I need ammunition not a ride." Not one of them. Wikiquote is exactly the right place to put any pithy opinion quotes (which still don't belong in a Wikipedia article lead,) so spend some time there if you can. HouseOfChange (talk) 19:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nazi personnel who resisted the Holocaust[edit]

You may be interested in the discussion at Category talk:Nazi personnel who resisted the Holocaust#Correct title?. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 14:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HopsonRoad:, commented there. Just out of curiosity, have we crossed paths before? Not sure how you found me. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mathglot: Thanks for commenting. I looked for contributors to related articles, who might have helpful insights for the discussion, which yours indeed were! Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 22:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, you forgot to sign your latest suggestion, re "pleonasm", a word to wear with pride! HopsonRoad (talk) 22:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, thanks! I'll go fix it now... Mathglot (talk) 22:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

War crimes and crimes against humanity[edit]

Hey, I noticed that you undid my page moves and you did make a good point as to why. I think that the article title just containing "war crimes" is quite misleading though. Are you okay if I move the article from "Russian war crimes" to "Russian war crimes and crimes against humanity" for example? Fluffy89502 (talk) 22:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fluffy89502: thanks for your question. It's a good one, and deserves to be discussed. However, no other editors interested in the question will find it here on my Talk page. Can you copy or transfer this message to Talk:Russian war crimes, so that others can see it, and join in if they wish? I'd be happy to move it and respond there if you like, or if you prefer, you can move it; let me know if you have a preference. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mathglot: I created the talk space on the talk page if you want to get involved. I will also be creating one on the respective Soviet page. Fluffy89502 (talk) 23:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fluffy89502:, sounds good. If you think the arguments are the same for the two articles, rather than have two separate discussions, you could have it in just one place, and have the other Talk page discussion just be a link to the first one. I'll respond in the next day or two. Mathglot (talk) 01:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Glass of Kvass for you![edit]

Mint bread kvas.jpg An ice-cold Glass of Slavic Class
In thanks, to cool you down after your efforts in the heated East Slavic topic area! EnlightenmentNow1792 (talk) 10:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 00:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New to Wikipedia, Requesting a Comment[edit]

Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia and I don't really know how this all works yet. I saw that you recently created some content on the Disinformation article and I was wondering what you would think of my question "Does the disinformation described in this letter, signed by many members of parliament and business leaders in Ukraine, sound like our Wikipedia article?"[[2]] on the Azov Battalion talk page. Please let me know if I am doing any of this wrong. I am definitely still learning.

Disconnected Phrases (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol redirect vote2.svg Courtesy link: Azov Battalion Mathglot (talk) 06:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your kind, patient advice and for giving me a better model for reasonable behavior than I was getting from that talk page. I appreciate it. Disconnected Phrases (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Disconnected Phrases:, you're most welcome, and thanks for the kind words. Mathglot (talk) 04:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Symbol redirect vote2.svg Courtesy link: WP:ANI#Rtkat3 close paraphrasing from Fandom without attribution
Symbol redirect vote2.svg Courtesy permalink: ANI rev. 1081781801

Hi Mathglot, thank you for your words at AN/I (regarding Fandom attribution). I was trying to help but it looks like I muddied the waters, so I appreciate your correction and will adjust my practices accordingly in the future! DanCherek (talk) 19:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek:, it's a very tricky area, and I'm still learning. I don't think you necessarily muddied the waters, you just gave your interpretation based on a (fallible, written-by-committee) guideline. I hope I did a good job in that discussion, but the guideline could stand to be improved.
Regarding policy or guidelines (e.g, WP:CWW, WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:PLAGIARISM) based on external documents like ToU, I find that when in doubt, we have to go to the fine print in the actual primary documents (some of which have legal implications, like licenses and terms of use, and I'm no lawyer!) to see what they actually say, and interpret from there. The guidelines try to interpret them for us to make it easier, and mostly they do a good job and I'm grateful for them, but we also have to remember that the guideline and policy pages (unlike ToU) can by modified by any Wikipedia editor. Sometimes, they make me raise an eyebrow, or in an attempt to be clear, they don't really do so as well as they might, or they leave too much room for interpretation than the original documents did, or they even mislead (as the doc at {{Fandom content}} currently does). Lawyers are writers by profession, and they carefully weigh every word in legal documents, sometimes reusing expressions that have withstood legal challenges in the past in order to have a level of confidence that they won't be challenged next time (at least, in precedent-based legal systems such as in the U.S., which has jurisdiction over Wikimedia because it's based in San Francisco). Unfortunately, that can lead to some baroque or confusing wording for us peasants. (Actually, I think that the WMF and Wikia/Fandom ToU do a very good job of using standard English, and being clear.) Normally, I trust the guidelines, but if a question arises, I find we have to go back to the originals to see if the guideline really got it right, or not.
I hope I've done a fair job of representing the originals in this case, and if the guidelines are less than completely clear, then they should be improved. If you were confused, that's good enough evidence for me that the guidelines are not doing the job. Or else, conversely, your interpretation was correct, and mine is completely wrong; but that's *still* an argument that the guidelines aren't doing a good enough job; so either way, imho, there's a guideline issue; it's not right that experienced editors like we both are should get tripped up by them. Any help you could offer improving the Plagiarism or Copy-within guideline, or any of the guidelines mentioned in connection with this, would be really appreciated. Mathglot (talk) 20:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely agree with what you've written here, and that the guidelines could use some improvement to be more understandable for the community. (Also gaining a newfound respect for my lawyer friends...) I'll take a closer look at the specific terms on Fandom when I have some time, and then give it some more thought! DanCherek (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DanCherek: Thanks! (Courtesy links added above.) Mathglot (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DanCherek: Maybe if we collaborated on some improvements, that could be a good thing. After all, given our tendency to interpret it differently, anything that gets both of us to agree on what it means, is probably a step in the right direction, and could be helpful for others as well. Mathglot (talk) 22:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I'd be happy to! DanCherek (talk) 23:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing signature[edit]

Hi Mathglot, thank you for your message. Unfortunately, I'm not sure what am I suppose to do to fix my signature. Could you please specify what exactly should I do? Or could you send me back your proposal of how it should look like? Thanks, --Silverije 21:31, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at your UTP. Mathglot (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) @Silverije: One of the two ''' is unclosed. But you can make it 21 characters shorter by using this markup: --[[User:Silverije|<b style="color:#705">Silve</b>]][[User talk:Silverije|<b style="color:ForestGreen;">rije</b>]] --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Redrose64, thank you very much. I'll try it now. --Silverije [[User:Silverije|<b style="display:inline; color:orange; background:purple; padding:2px 3px 2px 5px;">Silve</b>]][[User talk:Silverije|<b style="display:inline; color:orange; background:blue; padding:2px 3px 2px 3px;">rije</b>]] (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try the one fixed by Mathglot. It seems I made a mistake above. But this one seems to be OK. --Silverije 15:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Silverije: Your sig appears to be okay now, afaict. Mathglot (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Silverije: I intended that you copy the markup verbatim, and not put it through some processor that converts all the square brackets, pipes, less-thans etc. into numeric character references. If you had done as I intended, it would look like this: --Silverije. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Conditional heading[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Conditional heading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Talk: Azov Battalion/Sources[edit]

[3] can you verify that I didn't remove parts that shouldn't have been (and also, that someone didn't update the substed bit here while the original remained as before) I can, and looks good to me -- Glad you were able to make it work! :) — Shibbolethink ( ) 02:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cithara on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn before I even got there. Mathglot (talk) 01:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:RT (TV network) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Mathglot (talk) 01:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Str parendis[edit]

Has Template:Str parendis been substituted/used anywhere? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiCleanerMan: Template {{str parendis}} was created as one approach to a solution for one of the bug reports encountered during the testing of the customization of the "Find_sources" template. As explained (diff), that template didn't end up being needed and we found a better approach. I'll move it to my user space, as it could be useful in the future. Thanks for asking, Mathglot (talk) 20:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Conditional heading[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Conditional heading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym:, I don't see the nomination. When I follow the link, I see Template:Time Is A Thief. Please advise. Mathglot (talk) 10:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted the nomination as the template was different than what I thought. It's still not 100% good as it disables the edit and subscribe links, but my rational for nomination was that it wasn't a real header, which after inspecting the html output I see that it is. Gonnym (talk) 11:39, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll be looking at that. I know that there are suggestions for selective transclusion (which this is not) about how to add an "edit" link for the transcluded section, and maybe that could be used as a model. There's also the {{vte}} links used in Infoboxes; and finally, we could simply add the edit and subscribe links as they currently appear in normal sections, if that makes the most sense. Mathglot (talk) 22:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Syro-Malabar Church on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clara Knecht[edit]

Concenrning Clara Knecht could be so kind as to write to me underneath here the exact wikicode you uswed for diff ? I would really appreciate as my diffs do not link properly to the special diff edits. warm regards, Nattes à chat (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nattes à chat:, sure, it is the following:
[[WP:RIA|Repairing insufficient attribution]]: The [[Special:Diff/1082491583|previous edit]] of 13:18, 13 April 2022 was [[WP:CWW|copied]] from the French article [[:fr:Clara Knecht]]; the edits of 14:11, 18 April and 14:14, 18 April were [[WP:TFOLWP|translated]] from the French article [[fr:Clara Knecht]]; see that article's history for attribution.
Please note two important things about this:
  1. This style is only for fixing up attribution for copying done in the past; that is, it is used only for already-existing articles where you forgot to add the recommended attribution statement to the edit summary the first time around at the time when the copying (or translation) was performed, and you want to fix it up now, after the fact. Do not use this style going forward for new cases of copying/translating content; the style for that is much simpler (see WP:CWW and WP:TFOLWP).
  2. If you do want to repair insufficient attribution for some copying performed earlier, the style you see above is more complex than the minimum requirement, and you don't have to duplicate that style if you don't want to; I use the more complex version for convenience, but it isn't required. Here is a simpler edit summary for that same edit that fully satisfies the requirement:
    Note: The previous edit of 13:18, 13 April 2022 was copied from the French article [[:fr:Clara Knecht]]; the edits of 14:11 and 14:14, 18 April 2022 were translated from the French article Clara Knecht; see that article's history for attribution.
I use the more complex version with the extra links in it in an attempt to make the summary more convenient and to be more helpful to readers of the page history who might not be familiar with Wikipedia copyright and licensing. But you don't have to go the extra mile if you don't want to; per the licensing requirement, only the French article name needs to be hyperlinked; all the other links are just a convenience.
Also, just a reminder that going forward, the attribution statement for new translation or copying that you make and attribute in the edit summary at the same time, is very simple:
Translated content from the French article [[:fr:<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution.
(Change the word 'translated' to 'copied' as appropriate.) You don't have to make it more complicated than that, unless you wish to. Thanks for asking, and thanks also for your contributions and translations from French Wikipedia! Feel free to contact me any time. Mathglot (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Very useful, thank you so much ! it ws the [[Special:Diff/1082491583|previous edit]] that I missed :). I have finished updating the published articles, not quite my sandboxes. Nattes à chat (talk) 22:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nattes à chat: If you have moved the sandbox to an article previously, and fixed attribution in the article page history, you don't have to duplicate that effort by adding it back to the sandbox as well. Think of the bottom line: if a user wants to trace the copied or translated content appearing in an article back to the original editors by checking the edit summaries in the page history, can they do it? If they can find the attribution statement about Clara Knecht in the page history, there's no need to add it back into the sandbox as well. Conversely, if you start a new sandbox in the future with content copied or translated from fr-wiki and you attribute it in the edit summary at the same time, then when you later move the sandbox to main space, you don't need to attribute it a second time; the original attribution remains in the history of the page, and can be found by anyone who is interested in looking for it. Mathglot (talk) 22:51, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ah ok in the mean time I continued to apply it to every edit so this will save me some time :) Nattes à chat (talk) 11:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RfC comments[edit]

  • Mathglot, thanks for chiming in at the ARW RfC and leaving comments about extra links, MOS issue, etc. I took the liberty of moving your comments to the below Comments section to keep the polling section simple. Hope this is okay with you. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 00:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Indochinese tiger on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Request withdrawn. Mathglot (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your tactful but clear and firm edits at Sichuan cuisine. You probably noticed that the editor is in a student project, which brings up the question of why the instructor doesn't take responsibility. Still, this student is probably doing their best. Cheers in any case. ch (talk) 15:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CWH:, yes, I do a fair bit of work with student editors, and also try to support the one remaining content editor at Wiki Edu, because they are overloaded. Just reverted this run of ten edits by the same editor at Sichuan cuisine; given the long edit summary previously, I didn't go into as much detail this time, but I did leave them a brief UTP message. Hopefully, they'll learn about WP:Verifiability, or the instructor will step in. Mathglot (talk) 20:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

Dear @Mathglot:, You were right to collapse the discussion I was involved in here, ([4]). It was a fluid conversation and I used the wrong Talk page. Very sorry about that. I still have concerns about WP:AFDDISCUSS and WP:PLAYPOLICY (and possibly more) but I will address those concerns elsewhere. Thank you for doing the right thing. I appreciate it. Best regards, BetsyRMadison (talk) 23:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BetsyRMadison no worries; things get heated sometimes, and we might say things that belong in a different venue, as you said. I'm glad you saw it the way you did, as I didn't want to point fingers at anybody, or shut down valid content disagreement. (If it matters, I'm probably more sympathetic to your position on the merits than anyone else's, but now that I've collapsed part of the discussion, I may stay away from voting, to maintain neutrality.) Thanks for commenting, and happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 00:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EN1792[edit]

Apparently they got themselves an indefinite block and just appealed. The appeal compounded their sins and was righreously declined. A review of the decline was also declined. As somebody said elsewhere in another context, what a shame. Maybe you have already seen this, but anyone else passing through might need context.

Anyway, I told Doug Weller, the admin who declined to review, that the three of us had indeed been discussing Babel boxes, but that I wasn’t familiar with any subsequent admin interaction, and that WP:PNT needs Russian and Farsi translators. This is primarily a heads up that that all this happened.

The attitude concerns seem to be warranted, what can I say? How do you get blocked in an argument with an admin over a Babel box? So many questions. I would offer to mentor, but since a different admin has recently told me that *I* have an attitude, perhaps I should process that for a while instead. Anyway, I have seen Doug be a voice of reason in the past, perhaps at Panama Papers, and asked him for suggestions, fyi. Sorry your name was mentioned in this context because I was talking to you Elinruby (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on his UTP. Mathglot (talk) 19:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wikipedia:Using medical database collections[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia:Using medical database collections, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to sandbox/Drafts/*. Mathglot (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bihari Rajput on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:FIBA Men's World Ranking on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disability-related classes[edit]

I thought I'd reply to this comment here rather than on the article talk page, since it's a bit off topic. We've supported several disability-related courses, including three this semester. XFLQR is actually running their class for the third time. Helaine (who is blind, and is quite interested in getting more classes to participate in this area) might be interested in your ideas for areas to work on. I recommend shooting her an email at helaine@wikiedu.org. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again[edit]

Thanks again for your patience at Sichuan cuisine. I added a few references and will try to show in detail how to do it in hopes of getting help on other articles. Long shot, I know! ch (talk) 19:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Badly formed; unscrambled it, but not voted yet. Mathglot (talk) 03:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC) Voted; and also the next one on that page. Mathglot (talk) 00:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rajput on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ella Henderson on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re coordinating conjunctions and correlative conjunctions[edit]

Hi Mathglot. If you check the cites I just posted in Conjunction_(grammar)#Etymology, you'll see the trends re the recently diminishing use of the terms coordinating conjunction and correlative conjunction. Questions –

  1. Do you know of any terms that have been supplanting them, and that might be proper additions to the Conjunction (grammar) article?
  2. Do you have any concrete evidence for citing the reason re the abovementioned trend in diminished use?

I have my own theories (mainly, that coordinating conjunction and correlative conjunction are cross-linguistic and interlingual nightmares) that aren't ripe for Wikipedia. In my own lexicon, I shun the terms in favor of protologistic stuff that similarly isn't ripe for Wikipedia. Cheers.--Kent Dominic·(talk) 17:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiEd banner shell[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:WikiEd banner shell has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commented. Mathglot (talk) 18:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Mathglot, thank you for fixing my edit. That was very kind of you. Best wishes, BetsyRMadison (talk) 11:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yvw! (Re 1087580678 at Talk:Ukrainian Insurgent Army war against Russian occupation.) Mathglot (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Translation attribution shell[edit]

Template:Translation attribution shell has been nominated for merging with Template:Banner holder. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Izno (talk) 17:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commented. Mathglot (talk) 18:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Claire Danes on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Al-Aqsa Mosque on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2000 Mules on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hi Mathglot,

I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself.

Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board.

Cheers, and hope to see you around, (t · c) buidhe 00:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ill de[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Ill de has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ill es[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Ill es has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ill fr[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Ill fr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ill pt[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Ill pt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Glossary term[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Glossary term has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 17:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cpmf[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cpmf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cpmh[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cpmh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cpmr/doc[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cpmr/doc, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cpmr[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cpmr, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Muni AB footer[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muni AB footer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Muni AB8[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muni AB8, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Municipalities of Alberta/testcases[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Municipalities of Alberta/testcases, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cpmr13[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cpmr13, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cpmrowif[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cpmrowif, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Municipalities of Alberta/sandbox[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Municipalities of Alberta/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Little Prince Modifications[edit]

This discussion is relevant to the article, and is better placed on its talk page, where other interested editors may find it and participate. Mathglot (talk) 02:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cpmrowifb[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cpmrowifb, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Comma flip[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Comma flip, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cpm dab[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cpm dab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MD expand/tester[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MD expand/tester, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MD expand/tester2[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MD expand/tester2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nth slash[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mathglot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nth slash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of convicted war criminals on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A small request[edit]

Greetings @ Mathglot

Though I replied you @ WT:MOSBIO, my real concern has been @ this move discussion. In this discussion one option offered is usage of word 'Prophet' since it is claimed that news RS support such use but I am not sure effect on neutrality of the article if users approve of such usage. So I need to make a better presentation, Please let me know if you are aware of any sources which can be studied and presented.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 06:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Computer program on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Help talk:Citation Style 1 on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:34, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]