This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
Bot operator top icon
This user has signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic personal data.
This user is a member of the Wikimedia Volunteer Response Team.
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
This user uses Huggle to fight vandalism.
This user uses HotCat to work with categories.
This user edits using the gadget wikEd.
Identified as a precious editor on 12 February 2017
Email this user
This user has email notifications enabled.
This user uses the name JJMC89 on IRC.
JJMC89's page on GitHub

User talk:JJMC89

  (Redirected from User talk:JJMC89 bot III)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This user has opted out of talkbacks

This user prefers to receive notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to him on other pages. No talkback messages are needed.

JJMC89 Bot and "Extract" template transclusions[edit]

Hi JJMC89. JJMC89 bot seems to recently coming across more and more files being transcluded into articles and other pages by the template {{Extract}}. Perhaps this isn't a recent phenomenon, but it does seem more commons that before. Anyway, when the bot comes across one of these files, there's really nothing to remove from the violating pages since there's nothing but template syntax on that page; so, there's nothing for the bot to do. Adding the syntax "noinclude" to the page with the rationale seems to work in most cases, but I'm wondering if there's a better way to stop these transclusions from happening. For an aexample of what I'm referring to, see File:Arianespace logo.svg: it was being transcluded into Expendable launch system and History of spaceflight. FWIW, this used to happen mainly with portals, but now it seems to be more common in articles: nine files on the most recent update of User:JJMC89 bot/report/NFCC violations (61 files; Last updated: 12:23 am, Today (UTC+9)) were NFCC#10c violating transclusions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:31, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The default behavior for {{excerpt}} was changed. Now you have to set |freefiles=yes to remove non-free files. — JJMC89 07:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying that. I'll give that a try the next time I come across one of these. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Littleprince.JPG licensing question[edit]

Hi JJMC89. I was discusing this file's licensing at User talk:Masem#File:Littleprince.JPG because the file seems to be licensed as {{PD-old-70}} but was flagged as a NFCC#9 violation by both the betacommand bot and JJMC89 bot. Since there's no non-free license or non-free use rationale on the file's page (maybe there should be), I was wondering why the bots are treating this as non-free. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Iris cat.jpg

Thank you for blocking that IP.

Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]