Talk:Homestead (buildings)

Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Agriculture (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Home Living (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
 

Incorrect redirect[edit]

Homestead (buildings) - does not mean Smallholding - where it is redirected to - complete missuse of redirect SatuSuro 09:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

NPOV / relevance[edit]

The stuff about Kunderang reads like a tourist office advert. Unless this article is actually about homesteads in Australia, what is the relevance of the Kunderang paragraph and photo? Edwin Greenwood (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Actually this is not a notable article and is of doubtful use. Kunderang is mentioned as a free photo was available and this homestead is unique because it is the only known homestead constructed from solid, rare Australian Red Cedar (Toona ciliata) throughout. The cattle station, too, was unusual in that it was very isolated, in rough country and family lived (and some were accidentally killed there, too). Several books have been written on the notable Kunderang Station. Please feel free to contribute further to the article. Cgoodwin (talk) 23:11, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
If it's that notable, it should have it's own article. Tacking it on to this one, which is about homesteads in general, is not appropriate. 76.102.27.141 (talk) 15:43, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
I agree with 76.102.27.141. Out of all the homesteads in existence, to single out one of them for special coverage in this way makes no sense. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)